Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
111 bytes removed ,  13:27, March 23, 2007
Correct article; how many courts have held this?
Line 1: Line 1: −
A creation scientist is one who attempts to use traditional tools of science to prove the scientific factuality of the Bible.  
+
A creation scientist is one who attempts to use traditional tools of science to show that the scientific evidence is consistent with the biblical record.  
   −
Where former Christians accepted the Bible on faith, creation scientists seek to defend its inerrancy on scientific grounds.
+
United States courts have held that creation science, as practiced by creation scientists, is a form of religion.  ''See, e.g., Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F. Supp.2d 724.
−
 
  −
United States courts have consistently held that creation science, as practiced by creation scientists, is a form of religion.  ''See, e.g., Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F. Supp.2d 724.
 
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu