Changes

Evolutionist scientists criticize Baraminology. These people claim Baraminology lacks rigorous testing and  fails to produce any peer reviewed scientific research.{{fact}} It is regarded as pseudoscience by evolutionist scientists. However their claim has been rejected by creation scientists who described it as a young field still in development and stated that criticism can be resolved with further research<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_3/baraminology.htm The Current Status of Baraminology, Todd Charles Wood, CRSQ Vol 43 No 3, December 2006]</ref>.

Evolutionist scientists criticize Baraminology. These people claim Baraminology lacks rigorous testing and  fails to produce any peer reviewed scientific research.{{fact}} It is regarded as pseudoscience by evolutionist scientists. However their claim has been rejected by creation scientists who described it as a young field still in development and stated that criticism can be resolved with further research<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_3/baraminology.htm The Current Status of Baraminology, Todd Charles Wood, CRSQ Vol 43 No 3, December 2006]</ref>.

No creature has ever been observed changing from one Baramin into another. Evolutionist [[Richard Lenski]] claims to have observed a bacteria evolving, but even if the unproven claim<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Flaws_in_Richard_Lenski_Study</ref> is true, the bacteria is still bacteria, it has not left it's Baramin.

No creature has ever been observed changing from one Baramin into another. Evolutionist [[Richard Lenski]] claims to have observed a bacteria evolving, but even if the unproven claim<ref>Batten, Don, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5827 Bacteria ‘evolving in the lab’?], 14th June 2008 (Creation Ministries International)</ref> is true, the bacteria is still bacteria, it has not left its Baramin.

==Further Information==

==Further Information==