257
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 56:
Line 56: +
Talk:Origin of Life (view source)
Revision as of 14:08, December 30, 2008
, 14:08, December 30, 2008→Rebuttals of problems: added a response
:: The "chicken or egg" problem has been solved for some time now. The answer is neither: RNA. This was shown with the [http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Spiegelman-Monster Spiegelman Monster]. [[User:WilliamBeason|WilliamBeason]] 23:06, 29 December 2008 (EST)
:: The "chicken or egg" problem has been solved for some time now. The answer is neither: RNA. This was shown with the [http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Spiegelman-Monster Spiegelman Monster]. [[User:WilliamBeason|WilliamBeason]] 23:06, 29 December 2008 (EST)
::: Actually, it's never been a problem. It's been known for about 6,000 years now that God created chickens, not eggs. As for Spiegelman's monster, what does some intelligently-designed replication solve when the organism gradually fades away? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:24, 30 December 2008 (EST)
::: Actually, it's never been a problem. It's been known for about 6,000 years now that God created chickens, not eggs. As for Spiegelman's monster, what does some intelligently-designed replication solve when the organism gradually fades away? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:24, 30 December 2008 (EST)
:::: Yes, I realize that God created chickens 6,000 years ago. By putting "chicken or egg" in parentheses I was referencing where the article spoke of whether DNA or proteins came first. The current leading theory that naturalists (those who believe life began without God) have is RNA. The only problem I have with the article is that the stance that naturalists take is being misrepresented. Were their viewpoints to be represented, it would be much more effective when their arguments were taken down. [[User:WilliamBeason|WilliamBeason]] 09:08, 30 December 2008 (EST)
==Superfluous link==
==Superfluous link==