257
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 77:
Line 77: + + + + + +
Talk:Origin of Life (view source)
Revision as of 15:35, December 31, 2008
, 15:35, December 31, 2008→Naturalist Views: new section
It would probably be a good idea to remove the wikilink to "Origin of Life" in the final paragraph. It doesn't make much sense to link to an article from within the article:)--[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 16:24, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
It would probably be a good idea to remove the wikilink to "Origin of Life" in the final paragraph. It doesn't make much sense to link to an article from within the article:)--[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 16:24, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
: Done, thanks, and in the previous section also. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:14, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
: Done, thanks, and in the previous section also. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:14, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
== Naturalist Views ==
It would make sense to include a clear explanation of each of the naturalist theories. Separated from the explanations can be a section that rebuts them. If we present the theories in a ''calm'' unbiased manner and rebut them logically, the article will have a greater chance of having an effect on people. The article needs to be presented in such a way that any person with an open mind will easily be able to see the truth rather than a way that makes us look like uneducated mules who do not even understand what they are arguing against.
To do this, we need to make sure that we understand exactly what the naturalist views are. The more we know about their views, the easier it will be to find counter-evidence and counter-arguments. Also, the more clearly that we present the naturalist views, the easier it will be to show visitors to this site the fallacies and other problems with naturalist views.