nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + + +
rabbits and "good" treatments
I am a scientist and I have yet to meet a peer who believes in a 6000 year old Earth. Anyway, if you are looking for a surefire way to falsify evolution then the classic is "Rabbits in the Carboniferous". If Creationism is true then one would expect the occasional inconsistany like that (as well as fossilised remains of gigantic humans). [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 10:59, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
I am a scientist and I have yet to meet a peer who believes in a 6000 year old Earth. Anyway, if you are looking for a surefire way to falsify evolution then the classic is "Rabbits in the Carboniferous". If Creationism is true then one would expect the occasional inconsistany like that (as well as fossilised remains of gigantic humans). [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 10:59, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::I can't help it if you've not met any. As I said, I know quite a few (yeah, okay, I'm not suggesting that my "sample" is random. My point is that they really exist). If rabbits were found in the carboniferous, would it continue to be labelled "carboniferous"? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:03, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
: The link follows, Philip. Remember to keep an open mind. Behold, for [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG#Creationism| the truth] shall set you free.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 11:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
: The link follows, Philip. Remember to keep an open mind. Behold, for [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG#Creationism| the truth] shall set you free.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 11:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::Finding the section wasn't the problem, it was finding a treatment that was "good". ;-) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:03, 23 March 2007 (EDT)