18
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + +
Talk:Red-letter Christian (view source)
Revision as of 01:45, January 2, 2009
, 01:45, January 2, 2009no edit summary
I agree with the first comment that it was a good article in it's previous form. I see your point Aschlafly, but I think with your changes it seemed too biased in the opposite direction. I've attempted to find a compromise. Any comments?
I agree with the first comment that it was a good article in it's previous form. I see your point Aschlafly, but I think with your changes it seemed too biased in the opposite direction. I've attempted to find a compromise. Any comments?
I've tried again because my previous change clearly wasn't liked. I just think the Aschlafly's version reads as too fierce a condemnation of 'Red-letter Christians' to be taken by a reader as reliable information. If people still prefer Aschafly's version to mine, let's try the Talk Page to discuss other options?