Changes

:::::: I think the problem is here a lack of clarity in the first commandment, specifically what is meant by "verifiable" They really should elaborate considerably, especially since this is such a controversial arena. [[User:Qc|Qc]] 19:22, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

:::::: I think the problem is here a lack of clarity in the first commandment, specifically what is meant by "verifiable" They really should elaborate considerably, especially since this is such a controversial arena. [[User:Qc|Qc]] 19:22, 10 March 2008 (EDT)

::On what basis do you claim that the bible is reliable?  I see nothing in either [[Bible]] nor [[Category:Bible]] which attempts to explain the bible's supposed reliability.  If you're going to call the Bible a reliable source I think you should justify it.  --[[User:Tigerthink|Tigerthink]] 20:42, 1 January 2009 (EST)

::On what basis do you claim that the bible is reliable?  I see nothing in either [[Bible]] nor [[:Category:Bible]] which attempts to explain the bible's supposed reliability.  If you're going to call the Bible a reliable source I think you should justify it.  --[[User:Tigerthink|Tigerthink]] 20:42, 1 January 2009 (EST)

::: You didn't look hard enough.  In [[:Category:Bible]] there is an entry for [[Biblical accuracy]], which does just what you ask for: an attempt to explain the Bible's reliability.  Admittedly, it's not much more than a stub, so "attempt" is an apt term, but it is at least an attempt.  Probably a few other articles in that category also provide some evidence of reliability, but I haven't checked further.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:34, 2 January 2009 (EST)

== Suggestion ==

== Suggestion ==