303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 52:
Line 52: + +
no edit summary
:::See, disagreeing with it doesn't make it bad.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 12:17, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
:::See, disagreeing with it doesn't make it bad.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 12:17, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::::The question of whether or not evolution is falsifiable would be a great debate for the evolution article (if we had an article of the scientific theory of evolution)but here it is simply a distraction. The question here is, "Is creation science falsifiable?"--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:23, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::::The question of whether or not evolution is falsifiable would be a great debate for the evolution article (if we had an article of the scientific theory of evolution)but here it is simply a distraction. The question here is, "Is creation science falsifiable?"--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:23, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
:::::My position on the matter is that is ''was'' when originally formulated in a scientific manner, and it has been falsified. The modern "theory of creationism" makes no significant predictions, in fact it goes out of its way to justify why the strata should be indistinguishable from gradulistic accounts, and so it isn't science. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 13:27, 23 March 2007 (EDT)