Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:     
The reference mentioned above suggests that there was some sort of adaptation.  How did the information for the adaptation get transferred from one generation to the next?  If the bacteria get taken out of their nylon-only environment and get put in an environment of plentiful multiple food sources, do they continue to feed on the nylon?  I stand by my original statement that they were waiting around for the nylon. --[[User:Descartes|Descartes]] 14:27, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 
The reference mentioned above suggests that there was some sort of adaptation.  How did the information for the adaptation get transferred from one generation to the next?  If the bacteria get taken out of their nylon-only environment and get put in an environment of plentiful multiple food sources, do they continue to feed on the nylon?  I stand by my original statement that they were waiting around for the nylon. --[[User:Descartes|Descartes]] 14:27, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:This is fairly basic microbiology and genetics.  There is a limited, but large, amount of information in a genome.  Mutation over time allows for novel genes (and their products).  It takes many, many generations, as non-lethal mutations are not frequent.  The individual bacteria did not "adapt"--they either divided or died.  If they survived to divide, the information in their genome was replicated via binary fission/mitosis and the two daughter cells in turn did the same.  INDIVIDUAL CELLS DID NOT ADAPT TO THE ENVIRONMENT, THE POPULATION DID.  If the population is moved out of a nylon-only environment, or any other environment with different selective pressures, the population either adapts as above, or dies out. [[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 14:34, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
1,660

edits

Navigation menu