Changes

[[Category:Conservapedia debates]]{{essay}}{{Essay By|Seekcommon}}

[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]{{essay}}{{Essay By|Seekcommon}}

I noticed on the main page the news item about adult stem cells and the byline indicating how (in the opinion of the author(s)) the "abortion" industry ''"continues to insist on unsuccessful embryonic stem cell research in the United States"'' and it continues to say how ''"In the case of a recently successful adult stem cell project for diabetics, "the research was done in Brazil because U.S. doctors were not interested in the approach."'' Nonsense.  I am not a researcher in that area, but know enough to understand that scientists go where the data leads them.  If adult stem cells will work like other stem cells, people will try them and such efforts continue.  It is utter nonsense to say that doctors in the US are not interested in that approach - perhaps they know a few things the author(s) do not know.  

I noticed on the main page the news item about adult stem cells and the byline indicating how (in the opinion of the author(s)) the "abortion" industry ''"continues to insist on unsuccessful embryonic stem cell research in the United States"'' and it continues to say how ''"In the case of a recently successful adult stem cell project for diabetics, "the research was done in Brazil because U.S. doctors were not interested in the approach."'' Nonsense.  I am not a researcher in that area, but know enough to understand that scientists go where the data leads them.  If adult stem cells will work like other stem cells, people will try them and such efforts continue.  It is utter nonsense to say that doctors in the US are not interested in that approach - perhaps they know a few things the author(s) do not know.