178
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: +
Reply
Removing the 'probably' is good, but a statement like that should really be backed up by a citation. Also what suddenly made you change mind from thinking he was probably a proponent to being certain?--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 09:06, 4 January 2009 (EST)
Removing the 'probably' is good, but a statement like that should really be backed up by a citation. Also what suddenly made you change mind from thinking he was probably a proponent to being certain?--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 09:06, 4 January 2009 (EST)
:Reading his latest book (2002). And these are cited. Stop the liberal double-talk. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 09:09, 4 January 2009 (EST)
:Reading his latest book (2002). And these are cited. Stop the liberal double-talk. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 09:09, 4 January 2009 (EST)
::Really, because as of ten minutes ago you didn't seem as certain? I don't have a copy of the book to hand, so maybe you could provide a quote of his hate speech? I think it would be a good thing include in the article. And what exactly do you mean by double-talk? Perhaps you could create an article about it?--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 09:14, 4 January 2009 (EST)