Block, SkipCaptcha
8,517
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − Line 55:
Line 54: +
Debate:Is "Coercive Interrogation" consistent with Christian Values? (view source)
Revision as of 19:16, January 4, 2009
, 19:16, January 4, 2009cat
"Coercive Interrogation" can refer to a number of methods currently being used in the War Against Terror. Some are "minor"(e.g. sleep deprivation), others "major" (e.g. waterboarding, physical abuse). Sometimes they are used to extract immediately vital information, sometimes for less immediate needs.
"Coercive Interrogation" can refer to a number of methods currently being used in the War Against Terror. Some are "minor"(e.g. sleep deprivation), others "major" (e.g. waterboarding, physical abuse). Sometimes they are used to extract immediately vital information, sometimes for less immediate needs.
Where do Christian values intersect with these practices?
Where do Christian values intersect with these practices?
I would have preferred to see the U.S. host a conference of religious leaders to discuss Middle East Peace, because military and political actions generally don't make much progress. Peace thrives in an atmosphere of voluntary cooperation. You can't make people be peaceful. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:59, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
I would have preferred to see the U.S. host a conference of religious leaders to discuss Middle East Peace, because military and political actions generally don't make much progress. Peace thrives in an atmosphere of voluntary cooperation. You can't make people be peaceful. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:59, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]