10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,693:
Line 1,693: + + + + + +
Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)
Revision as of 04:30, January 6, 2009
, 04:30, January 6, 2009→Demanding Major Change: new section
::::That is hardly an argument, Patriot1505. I ask you, when is the last time you sat down for a beer or a slice of ham with George Bush? Would that make our current President a possible Muslim as well? Please, this very article and arguments like yours is what takes away from the credibility of an otherwise well-intentioned site (from the little I've seen thus far). This piece is quite honestly, very unchristian. [[User:DrewS|DrewS]] 18:42, 5 January 2009 (EST)
::::That is hardly an argument, Patriot1505. I ask you, when is the last time you sat down for a beer or a slice of ham with George Bush? Would that make our current President a possible Muslim as well? Please, this very article and arguments like yours is what takes away from the credibility of an otherwise well-intentioned site (from the little I've seen thus far). This piece is quite honestly, very unchristian. [[User:DrewS|DrewS]] 18:42, 5 January 2009 (EST)
== Demanding Major Change ==
I'm not well educated on Obama enough to write an article on him, and even if I did I would not know where to start, but come on! Someone step up to the plate and correct this article. We atleast need a rewrite that presents a case for him being a christian. It can include all the Rev. Wright stuff you want, but if Conservapedia wants to become "The trustworthy encyclopedia" it has to convey both sides.
As a conservapedian, I don't like where this site is going. When writing articles, we can have conservative viewpoints, just not conservative crusades.