4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: + +
no edit summary
::::::::Yes, StraightsRpeople will be blocked if that user name is created. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 13:43, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::::::::Yes, StraightsRpeople will be blocked if that user name is created. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 13:43, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::::::::Good to know these things. Thanks --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 14:01, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::::::::Good to know these things. Thanks --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 14:01, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
I don't see the need for usernames that probe the boundaries or, indeed come anywhere near them. And in general I think usernames that carry an ideological message of any kind are a bad idea. They invite misunderstanding, and I hope that our identities are more than our ideologies. I'm not sure how difficult it is to create an account these days, but the obvious solution is for ''Gays r people'' to choose a less tendentious user name. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:28, 23 March 2007 (EDT)