1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + +
Talk:Scientific controversy over the cause of AIDS (view source)
Revision as of 19:28, January 7, 2009
, 19:28, January 7, 2009→One Reference
:You're referring to the African starvation hypothesis, which clearly is not relevant to the industrialized West. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:24, 7 January 2009 (EST)
:You're referring to the African starvation hypothesis, which clearly is not relevant to the industrialized West. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:24, 7 January 2009 (EST)
::AIDS is AIDS, though, regardless of the setting. Otherwise you're dealing with a different condition, in this case malnutrition versus AIDS. I sincerely doubt that the source reflects someone practicing sound medicine. The nutrition-cures-AIDS one statement undermines the credibility of anything else in that source. I could also add that he's trying to explain cases where AIDS is transmitted via corticosteriods instead of HIV, but there's no provable correlation for this. A better source is needed for credible alternative theories to HIV, and this one should be removed. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 14:28, 7 January 2009 (EST)