1,237
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: +
Talk:Scientific controversy over the cause of AIDS (view source)
Revision as of 19:52, January 7, 2009
, 19:52, January 7, 2009→Jumping off point
:The only problem is that Bauer is trained as an electrochemist and was never formally trained in the biological sciences to understand immunobiology, biochemistry nor basic virology and pathology. It would be much better to find a person with a biological sciences background due to the credibility.--[[User:Able806|Able806]] 14:44, 7 January 2009 (EST)
:The only problem is that Bauer is trained as an electrochemist and was never formally trained in the biological sciences to understand immunobiology, biochemistry nor basic virology and pathology. It would be much better to find a person with a biological sciences background due to the credibility.--[[User:Able806|Able806]] 14:44, 7 January 2009 (EST)
::Not sure what such Academic busy work like "immunobiology, biochemistry, basic virology, pathology" has to do with the matter. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 14:49, 7 January 2009 (EST)
::Not sure what such Academic busy work like "immunobiology, biochemistry, basic virology, pathology" has to do with the matter. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 14:49, 7 January 2009 (EST)
:::...huh? To understand the progression of the AIDS virus (?), should one not be educated in the fields of biochemistry, microbiology, and other workings of microorganisms and their connection with the human body? [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 14:52, 7 January 2009 (EST)