1,237
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + +
Talk:Scientific controversy over the cause of AIDS (view source)
Revision as of 20:01, January 7, 2009
, 20:01, January 7, 2009→One Reference
:::...huh? To understand the progression of the AIDS virus (?), should one not be educated in the fields of biochemistry, microbiology, and other workings of microorganisms and their connection with the human body? [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 14:52, 7 January 2009 (EST)
:::...huh? To understand the progression of the AIDS virus (?), should one not be educated in the fields of biochemistry, microbiology, and other workings of microorganisms and their connection with the human body? [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 14:52, 7 January 2009 (EST)
::::At some point, too strong a belief in a need for these specialities becomes a source of deception. Certainly, in research and development specialists and specialization have their place and are useful, but such skills, which is all they really are, are no big deal in the evaluation of their results. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 14:58, 7 January 2009 (EST)
::::At some point, too strong a belief in a need for these specialities becomes a source of deception. Certainly, in research and development specialists and specialization have their place and are useful, but such skills, which is all they really are, are no big deal in the evaluation of their results. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 14:58, 7 January 2009 (EST)
:::::So if I were to field a study dealing with astrophysics and the origins of the universe (please keep in mind I'm a registered nurse and have no formal education in either field), you wouldn't step back and question it? [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 15:01, 7 January 2009 (EST)