Automoderated users, edit
1,887
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: − +
Talk:Scientific controversy over the cause of AIDS (view source)
Revision as of 20:08, January 7, 2009
, 20:08, January 7, 2009→One Reference: ++
:::::So if I were to field a study dealing with astrophysics and the origins of the universe (please keep in mind I'm a registered nurse and have no formal education in either field), you wouldn't step back and question it? [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 15:01, 7 January 2009 (EST)
:::::So if I were to field a study dealing with astrophysics and the origins of the universe (please keep in mind I'm a registered nurse and have no formal education in either field), you wouldn't step back and question it? [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 15:01, 7 January 2009 (EST)
::::::Well, [[Einstein]] had very little education in his topic of interest. Only an undergraduate degree. Einstein is a good case for how too much respect for hierarcies and bureacratic/instituational norms can cloud our judgements. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 15:06, 7 January 2009 (EST)
::::::Well, [[Einstein]] had very little education in his topic of interest. Only an undergraduate degree. Einstein is a good case for how too much respect for hierarcies and bureacratic/instituational norms can cloud our judgements. Like many trained Ph.D., Bauer is compotent enough to evaluate this sort of work. It's a logical fallacy (ad hominem) to say that is not.--[[User:RickD|RickD]] 15:06, 7 January 2009 (EST)