Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + + +
Talk:Scientific controversy over the cause of AIDS (view source)
Revision as of 20:28, January 7, 2009
, 20:28, January 7, 2009What's our standard?
--[[User:RickD|RickD]] 14:58, 7 January 2009 (EST)
--[[User:RickD|RickD]] 14:58, 7 January 2009 (EST)
How about findings published in a peer reviewed scientific journal? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:28, 7 January 2009 (EST)
==Jumping off point==
==Jumping off point==
*The former Virgina Tech professor Henry H. Bauer recently wrote the book [http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Persistence-Failings-AIDS-Theory/dp/0786430486 ''The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory''] (2007). I read through it and it's definitely a sourced, pro-intellectual book. Anyway, I recommend it as a respectable place to start. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 14:36, 7 January 2009 (EST)
*The former Virgina Tech professor Henry H. Bauer recently wrote the book [http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Persistence-Failings-AIDS-Theory/dp/0786430486 ''The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory''] (2007). I read through it and it's definitely a sourced, pro-intellectual book. Anyway, I recommend it as a respectable place to start. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 14:36, 7 January 2009 (EST)