4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 112:
Line 112: + +
Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)
Revision as of 21:56, January 8, 2009
, 21:56, January 8, 2009→Hussein reference
Why don't we let each reader decide for himself how believable each source is? I'd hate to see a claim deleted simply because one party in a dispute doubts it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:58, 27 November 2008 (EST)
Why don't we let each reader decide for himself how believable each source is? I'd hate to see a claim deleted simply because one party in a dispute doubts it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:58, 27 November 2008 (EST)
:So what I'm getting out of this is that some of the users here believe that their personal opinions and worldviews are the absolute truth. Does that sound like people who are open-minded and searching for truth, or people searching for a way to validate their Conservative beliefs, whether they be correct or not? I'm not saying that Liberals have it right; quite to the contrary, I believe that there is no single worldview containing no flaws whatsoever, whether you be Liberal, Conservative, or anything else! But this is Conservapedia, where people from all walks of life are accepted. We must consider potential truths from all sides of an argument; otherwise, we are kidding ourselves if we believe that we have thoroughly analyzed any empirical situation. Please, don't assert your personal ideology to be the absolute reality!--[[user:Confused|Confused]]
==Debate On Obama's Religion==
==Debate On Obama's Religion==