1,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35:
Line 35: + + + +
→Dan Brown?: new section
I do not want to censor Conservapedia, but shouldn't we choose the best possible examples whenever possible? I believe we have a resonsiblity to the chidlren on the internet to provide wholesome role models whenever we can. Literature is a huge field. Can't we find a more morally upright exemplar than Byron? —[[User:AshleyS|Asphalt P. Stanky]] 15:34, 11 November 2008 (EST)
I do not want to censor Conservapedia, but shouldn't we choose the best possible examples whenever possible? I believe we have a resonsiblity to the chidlren on the internet to provide wholesome role models whenever we can. Literature is a huge field. Can't we find a more morally upright exemplar than Byron? —[[User:AshleyS|Asphalt P. Stanky]] 15:34, 11 November 2008 (EST)
== Dan Brown? ==
Dan Brown? On a ''literature'' page!? Please remove that, anyone with sysop rights. Popular he may be, but he certainly does not write anything worthy of the title literature. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 23:06, 8 January 2009 (EST)