Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
268 bytes added ,  18:43, January 10, 2009
reply
Line 11: Line 11:     
About the "Group Theory" error: Aschlafly on 6 January 2007 added that the M-W definition of "Group Theory" is wrong to use "group" to define itself. Conservapedia's definition of [[group theory]] (written by Aschlafly, 6 January 2007) also uses "group" to define itself. Like Merriam-Webster, Conservapedia then has a separate entry for mathematical [[group]]. [[User:Reg32Idaho|Reg32Idaho]] 13:37, 10 January 2009 (EST)
 
About the "Group Theory" error: Aschlafly on 6 January 2007 added that the M-W definition of "Group Theory" is wrong to use "group" to define itself. Conservapedia's definition of [[group theory]] (written by Aschlafly, 6 January 2007) also uses "group" to define itself. Like Merriam-Webster, Conservapedia then has a separate entry for mathematical [[group]]. [[User:Reg32Idaho|Reg32Idaho]] 13:37, 10 January 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
: My 1994 printed copy of Merriam-Webster does not have a definition for mathematical group, so its definition of group theory in at least that edition remains circular.  But thanks for your observation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:43, 10 January 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,567

edits

Navigation menu