| Line 52: |
Line 52: |
| | ::Stating that black holes don't exist is akin to believing the moon landing was faked. The existence of black holes and the fact that they have been spotted is undisputed by anyone who has the knowledge and experience to know what they are looking at. I have had the privilege of seeing two of these black holes myself. They are out there and have been spotted, and that is a direct, firsthand witness statement. | | ::Stating that black holes don't exist is akin to believing the moon landing was faked. The existence of black holes and the fact that they have been spotted is undisputed by anyone who has the knowledge and experience to know what they are looking at. I have had the privilege of seeing two of these black holes myself. They are out there and have been spotted, and that is a direct, firsthand witness statement. |
| | ::May you be touched by his noodly appendage, or if that isn't your cup of tea, may you be blessed by the goat Heidrún. RAmen.-[[User:Ieuan|Ieuan]] 17:06, 10 January 2009 (EST) | | ::May you be touched by his noodly appendage, or if that isn't your cup of tea, may you be blessed by the goat Heidrún. RAmen.-[[User:Ieuan|Ieuan]] 17:06, 10 January 2009 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | :::* It's "an 's'", not "a 's'". |
| | + | :::* If you missed just one 's', then that part of the sentence would read "under the rules youself created", which is ''still'' wrong. |
| | + | :::* If you missed an 'r' and an 's', then that part of the sentence would read "under the rules yourself created", which is '''still''' wrong. |
| | + | :::* An [[ad hominem]] attack means to reply to the logic in your arguments by attacking your character. I did no such thing. I didn't attack your character in any way. I asked if you were a materialist, then pointed out that materialists are Hell-bound. If you have a problem with your final resting place, I suggest you reconsider your path in life. I do not suggest that the Hell-bound are never able to make logical arguments. |
| | + | :::* "Christian" is capitalized. Did you leave it uncapitalized on purpose? If so, I suggest you blaspheme somewhere else. |
| | + | :::* That is not how semicolons are used in standard English. |
| | + | :::* You need a comma after "but" for the aside. |
| | + | :::* You do not need commas around "friendly", just like you don't need commas around "red" in "big red inflatable ball" |
| | + | :::* I will not discuss the friendly lesson here, except to note that stylistic choices are different than maintaining correctness. Comma placement and word choice are different beasts. |
| | + | :::* The sentence starting "All civilian" has no main verb, so I can't respond to it. |
| | + | :::* Hyperbole about the moon landing is simply rhetoric. If there is no argument, there can be no response. |
| | + | :::* Wikipedia may accept your anonymous evidence, but we are more careful here. |
| | + | :::* Black holes can't be seen. What I suppose you mean is that you infer their existence. Your inference is not particularly convincing. |
| | + | :::* Please take your graven goat pasta idols elsewhere. Here we show some simple respect for God. |
| | + | :::* I am done with this pointless, blasphemous discussion. It is not encyclopedic. I suggest you contribute to this encyclopedia. It is a good way to improve your writing skills. I have been contributing partially for that reason. Maybe you could join me in adding articles and value, rather than taking the name of my Lord in vain? |
| | + | :::* If you decide not to, you may have the last word here, as I will no longer reply to this silliness. I hope you will decide to contribute instead. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 18:33, 10 January 2009 (EST) |