Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 53: Line 53:  
:::::: The problem comes when liberals attempt to use the terms as smears, and we stop using them as a result.  I for one am proud to call myself a fundamentalist, and I know many other who feel the same way. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 18:35, 10 January 2009 (EST)
 
:::::: The problem comes when liberals attempt to use the terms as smears, and we stop using them as a result.  I for one am proud to call myself a fundamentalist, and I know many other who feel the same way. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 18:35, 10 January 2009 (EST)
 
:::::: Me too. I take pride in saying I believe in fundamentalism. All would agree that ''-ism'' added to almost any word gives it a negative tone, yes?  For example, "science + t + ism = scientism" and scientism always refers to a bad set of science-related ideas.  --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 18:42, 10 January 2009 (EST)
 
:::::: Me too. I take pride in saying I believe in fundamentalism. All would agree that ''-ism'' added to almost any word gives it a negative tone, yes?  For example, "science + t + ism = scientism" and scientism always refers to a bad set of science-related ideas.  --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 18:42, 10 January 2009 (EST)
 
+
(Unindent) You have a point there. But now you have liberals calling muslim terrorists "fundamentalist muslims," to try to paint us with the same brush. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 18:54, 10 January 2009 (EST)
    
==Pro-life==
 
==Pro-life==
    
Andy, do you have a cite for the earlier attestation of "pro-life" than the one I provided? I think it's great that you've found a date that predates [[Roe v. Wade]]. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:38, 10 January 2009 (EST)
 
Andy, do you have a cite for the earlier attestation of "pro-life" than the one I provided? I think it's great that you've found a date that predates [[Roe v. Wade]]. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:38, 10 January 2009 (EST)
1,035

edits

Navigation menu