Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 246: Line 246:     
::Creationists are far afield from Intelligent Design advocates, but in both cases, it is important to suppress these secularist notions of ''inferable truth'' with recourse to unimpeachable sources, in this case, the Bible and common-sense observation of reality.  There is no evidence, without resorting to inference, for so many cherished liberal/secularist concepts.  This means that Evolution, for example, or Geologic Time Scale-ism, are belief systems of their own, but false ones, because they do not have The Bible, and the Truth of God's Word, behind them.  Who would you rather put your trust in?  Human scientists?  Or God?  Cracker, the Bible is the Only Truth you need.  Don't second-guess God. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 18:39, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::Creationists are far afield from Intelligent Design advocates, but in both cases, it is important to suppress these secularist notions of ''inferable truth'' with recourse to unimpeachable sources, in this case, the Bible and common-sense observation of reality.  There is no evidence, without resorting to inference, for so many cherished liberal/secularist concepts.  This means that Evolution, for example, or Geologic Time Scale-ism, are belief systems of their own, but false ones, because they do not have The Bible, and the Truth of God's Word, behind them.  Who would you rather put your trust in?  Human scientists?  Or God?  Cracker, the Bible is the Only Truth you need.  Don't second-guess God. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 18:39, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Wow.  I guess I'm the first one here, so I'll drop the f-bomb: '''''falsifiability'''''.  By explaining your "truth" that way, you prove how it's not science.-18:41, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
2,732

edits

Navigation menu