Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
144 bytes added ,  22:43, March 23, 2007
removed secularist edits
Line 10: Line 10:  
== Evidence ==
 
== Evidence ==
 
One of the first major books with evidence for intelligent design was [[Michael J. Behe]]'s.  Behe is a Professor of Biochemistry at Lehigh University.  He alleges in "Darwin's Black Box" [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684834936/thetalkorigin-20/] that there are certain ''irreducible complexities'' which can only be addressed by an intelligent designer.
 
One of the first major books with evidence for intelligent design was [[Michael J. Behe]]'s.  Behe is a Professor of Biochemistry at Lehigh University.  He alleges in "Darwin's Black Box" [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684834936/thetalkorigin-20/] that there are certain ''irreducible complexities'' which can only be addressed by an intelligent designer.
−
   
== Analogies ==
 
== Analogies ==
−
Many Intelligent Design advocates propose the "watch" analogy.  Imagine one is walking along a beach and suddenly encounters a wrist-watch.  Given its relative sophistication vis-a-vis its environment, and the obvious non-random care with which it was made, does the wrist-watch pre-suppose an Intelligent Designer? Scientists claim they have evidence that suggests such complexity does not require a deity.
+
Many Intelligent Design advocates propose the "watch" analogy.  Imagine one is walking along a beach and suddenly encounters a wrist-watch.  Given its relative sophistication vis-a-vis its environment, and the obvious non-random care with which it was made, does the wrist-watch pre-suppose an Intelligent Designer? Scientists allege that random causation can account for even the greatest complexity, whereas intelligent design proponents and creation scientists assume that given the deliberate nature of the watch, it must have had external design.
    
== External Link ==
 
== External Link ==
153

edits

Navigation menu