62
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + +
Debate:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics "When did Brahms live" or "Why did Monet paint grainstacks?" (view source)
Revision as of 15:55, January 12, 2009
, 15:55, January 12, 2009It's not a lost cause
I don't think any amount of time will bring conservapedia to any sort of "general encyclopedia" status. There is simply too much information out there for the selected group of people that subscribe to conservapedia to catalog efficiently. The reason wikipedia is so thorough is because they have a larger population of people contributing. Conservapedia's viewpoints (and very severe and in some cases biased mods) generally turn off many people that could contribute a wealth of information. [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]] 12:18, 18 May
I don't think any amount of time will bring conservapedia to any sort of "general encyclopedia" status. There is simply too much information out there for the selected group of people that subscribe to conservapedia to catalog efficiently. The reason wikipedia is so thorough is because they have a larger population of people contributing. Conservapedia's viewpoints (and very severe and in some cases biased mods) generally turn off many people that could contribute a wealth of information. [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]] 12:18, 18 May
:It's a question of quality against quantity. Yes, Conservapedia has fewer articles, but that's because the site is more strict about who gets to edit content, and more through in vetting data. There are some fields like art criticism that's dominated by liberals. It makes sens that, at this young state in Conservapedia's development, these topics would be lightly sparse. As the site grows and more Conservatives enter traditionally liberal fields, the expertise needed to grow Conservapedia will likewise grow. --[[User:AlexC|AlexC]] 10:55, 12 January 2009 (EST)
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
If I can't get to the library I've been finding Google Scholar to be incredibly useful. --[[User:RobinGoodfellow|RobinGoodfellow]] 19:18, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
If I can't get to the library I've been finding Google Scholar to be incredibly useful. --[[User:RobinGoodfellow|RobinGoodfellow]] 19:18, 8 July 2008 (EDT)