| − | The [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]] produced a report for the [[International Energy Agency]] (IEA) which states that the price for reducing human C0<sup>2</sup> 50% by the year 2050 will cost an estimated $45 trillion dollars or ''1.1 per cent of average annual global [[GDP]]''.<ref>[http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2218500/iea-calls-trillion-energy], Businessgreen.com, IEA calls for $45 trillion energy "revolution", June 6, 2008</ref> | + | The [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]] produced a report for the [[International Energy Agency]] (IEA) which states that the price for reducing human C0<sub>2</sub> 50% by the year 2050 will cost an estimated $45 trillion dollars or ''1.1 per cent of average annual global [[GDP]]''.<ref>[http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2218500/iea-calls-trillion-energy], Businessgreen.com, IEA calls for $45 trillion energy "revolution", June 6, 2008</ref> |
| − | Detractors argue that C0<sup>2</sup> is just a tiny component of the overall mechanisms that causes the climate to change. Human driven C0<sub>2</sub> is even less a component. <ref>[http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/1489], CFP, Medieval Environmentalists’ attack CO<sup>2</sup>, January21, 2008</ref> | + | Detractors argue that C0<sub>2</sub> is just a tiny component of the overall mechanisms that causes the climate to change. Human driven C0<sub>2</sub> is even less a component. <ref>[http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/1489], CFP, Medieval Environmentalists’ attack CO<sup>2</sup>, January21, 2008</ref> |