Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
278 bytes added ,  16:01, January 13, 2009
Line 217: Line 217:     
::: Andy, that hardly addresses the point raised. The claim is that abstinence is 100% effective against HPV. If a mother can pass it onto her child then lifelong abstinence failed to protect that child from HPV. Hence the claim cannot be true. See [[counterexample]] for an explanation of the logic here. [[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 10:43, 13 January 2009 (EST)
 
::: Andy, that hardly addresses the point raised. The claim is that abstinence is 100% effective against HPV. If a mother can pass it onto her child then lifelong abstinence failed to protect that child from HPV. Hence the claim cannot be true. See [[counterexample]] for an explanation of the logic here. [[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 10:43, 13 January 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:::: No, AndyJM, you're wrong.  A lack of abstinence caused that infection also.  The entry is correct, and you're on a fool's errand in trying to deny it.  Would you deny that 2+2=4 also, if liberals told you to?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:01, 13 January 2009 (EST)
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
    
<references/>
 
<references/>
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Navigation menu