109
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 222:
Line 222: + +
→Abstinence and HPV
::::: Would I deny that 2+2=4 if liberals told me to? I'm flabbergasted by that response to be honest. I have no idea how to respond to or desire to reply to that sort of rhetoric. [[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 11:08, 13 January 2009 (EST)
::::: Would I deny that 2+2=4 if liberals told me to? I'm flabbergasted by that response to be honest. I have no idea how to respond to or desire to reply to that sort of rhetoric. [[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 11:08, 13 January 2009 (EST)
::::::Why question the analogy rather than consider the point it is intended to make? Abstinence is still the answer to preventing infection: for the child to be safe, the parents need to be abstinent. Abstinence is a trans-generational safeguard, and ''all'' need to play their part. [[User:MikeSalter|MikeSalter]] 11:25, 13 January 2009 (EST)
::::::Why question the analogy rather than consider the point it is intended to make? Abstinence is still the answer to preventing infection: for the child to be safe, the parents need to be abstinent. Abstinence is a trans-generational safeguard, and ''all'' need to play their part. [[User:MikeSalter|MikeSalter]] 11:25, 13 January 2009 (EST)
::::::: MikeSalter, when you explain it like that it all becomes clear. I will concede that I was completely wrong. Andy and MikeSalter, well played sirs. [[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 11:30, 13 January 2009 (EST)
== References ==
== References ==
<references/>
<references/>