Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
191 bytes added ,  18:13, January 13, 2009
→‎First criticism: fraud: how Hoyle was punished
Line 75: Line 75:  
When the scientists requested the ability to use an electronic microscope and carbon-14 dating, the museum refused and withdrew the specimens from the scientists.<ref name="four" />
 
When the scientists requested the ability to use an electronic microscope and carbon-14 dating, the museum refused and withdrew the specimens from the scientists.<ref name="four" />
 
The same [[British]] Museum had been responsible for the [[Piltdown Man]] fraud.
 
The same [[British]] Museum had been responsible for the [[Piltdown Man]] fraud.
 +
 +
The [[Nobel Prize]] committee punished Sir [[Fred Hoyle]] for exposing this fraud by passing him over and giving its award to his underling for work that Hoyle was the undisputed leader on.
    
==Second criticism: not a transitional==
 
==Second criticism: not a transitional==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits

Navigation menu