Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
persecuted for undermining faith in evolution
I just changed the "fraud" bit. I didn't take it out but turned it into a report on what Hoyle was doing, rather than a finding of whether his claim was correct or not. Let readers know the facts, and let's not all argue over the conclusions. FACT: Hoyle called it a fraud. CONCLUSIONS: He was right/ He was wrong. [[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 19:45, 14 January 2009 (EST)
I just changed the "fraud" bit. I didn't take it out but turned it into a report on what Hoyle was doing, rather than a finding of whether his claim was correct or not. Let readers know the facts, and let's not all argue over the conclusions. FACT: Hoyle called it a fraud. CONCLUSIONS: He was right/ He was wrong. [[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 19:45, 14 January 2009 (EST)
:I think Andy's point was that Hoyle made himself unpopular by questioning the most important "[[missing link]]" fossil. Those who strongly believed in [[Evolution]] did not take kindly to an attempt to undermine their faith. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:58, 14 January 2009 (EST)
== Reversion explained ==
== Reversion explained ==