Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
760 bytes added ,  03:46, January 15, 2009
Line 212: Line 212:  
::::::::: You are incorrect to claim that I am unwilling to state my other political positions, given that I have already stated a number of them.  It is not my intention to ''discuss'' them here, as this is a page about gun control.  But as ''you'' have brought them up, I will state them.  First, I fail to see how a person who favours taxpayer-funded abortion can be ''against'' abortion.  But here are my positions on the things that you question:  I am opposed to abortion in all cases except where a choice has to be made between the life of the baby and the life of the mother.  And yes, I favour prohibiting it.  I favour lowering taxes.  I support more free enterprise and less government.  I oppose same-sex "marriage".  Given that I agree with you on all those points, there should be no need to discuss them further, and I would hope that you will now acknowledge that I am no "liberal".  Or will you instead ask further questions, trying to find something else to justify your opinion of me?
 
::::::::: You are incorrect to claim that I am unwilling to state my other political positions, given that I have already stated a number of them.  It is not my intention to ''discuss'' them here, as this is a page about gun control.  But as ''you'' have brought them up, I will state them.  First, I fail to see how a person who favours taxpayer-funded abortion can be ''against'' abortion.  But here are my positions on the things that you question:  I am opposed to abortion in all cases except where a choice has to be made between the life of the baby and the life of the mother.  And yes, I favour prohibiting it.  I favour lowering taxes.  I support more free enterprise and less government.  I oppose same-sex "marriage".  Given that I agree with you on all those points, there should be no need to discuss them further, and I would hope that you will now acknowledge that I am no "liberal".  Or will you instead ask further questions, trying to find something else to justify your opinion of me?
 
::::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:25, 14 January 2009 (EST)
 
::::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:25, 14 January 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::::::: Your conservative positions on those issues are welcome, but the rest of your posting is flawed.  Many politicians do state they are against abortion, yet vote for taxpayer-funded abortion.  I'm sure you have many in Australia who do that, and I wonder if you vote for them based on what they say.
 +
 +
:::::::::: Your claim that YECs and materialists are "completely incompatible" is illogical, and you haven't explained the incompatibility.  As I said (and you did address), belief in an occasional divine intervention does not necessarily negate one's adherence to materialism otherwise.  [[Thomas the Apostle]], for example, believed in [[Jesus]] based on materialism, not despite it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:46, 14 January 2009 (EST)
    
:::Andy, see comments in the section below called: "Gun Control and socialism vis a vis regulation" [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 18:22, 4 January 2009 (EST)
 
:::Andy, see comments in the section below called: "Gun Control and socialism vis a vis regulation" [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 18:22, 4 January 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Navigation menu