679
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 496:
Line 496: − +
→Criticism of McCarthy's methods
If the exchange with Welch is to be described, then it should also include McCarthy's point of view. If it is to include trivia from witnesses, then it should also explain just what the criticism is, and also give McCarthy's side. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:51, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
If the exchange with Welch is to be described, then it should also include McCarthy's point of view. If it is to include trivia from witnesses, then it should also explain just what the criticism is, and also give McCarthy's side. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:51, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
And exactly what is posted there that is not an "actual fact?"
And exactly what is currently posted in the article that is not an "actual fact?" It sounds like you actually want to remove facts -- not add to them.
--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 19:53, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 19:53, 23 March 2007 (EDT)