120
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + + +
contrast with Bushisms
:Fine, Addison....my only point was to allow time for someone to respond when asking, as the removed user did, before removing Admin edits. Thanks for helping clear this up. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 21:04, 18 January 2009 (EST)
:Fine, Addison....my only point was to allow time for someone to respond when asking, as the removed user did, before removing Admin edits. Thanks for helping clear this up. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 21:04, 18 January 2009 (EST)
* Just wondering: On the linked Bushisms page, it states it is a term coined by liberals and the article is also placed under the category of Liberal bias. From which political group is "Obama-isms" coined by and does this need mentioning?
* Also, is there a reason why one is hyphenated while the other isn't? Maybe it's better to gain some consistency in these respects. [[User:SJames|SJames]] 21:36, 18 January 2009 (EST)