I noticed that you added a statement about how non-constructive proofs are the only way to prove the insolvability of the quintic. As the proof of the insolvability of the quintic is one of the highlights of Galois theory you should know that this edit may not be looked on favorably by certain sysops here. Galois is quite the hero at Conservapedia as he was home schooled. Non constructive proofs are not in favor here. Drawing attention to the fact that the proof is non-constructive could cause you trouble. [[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 07:25, 18 January 2009 (EST) | I noticed that you added a statement about how non-constructive proofs are the only way to prove the insolvability of the quintic. As the proof of the insolvability of the quintic is one of the highlights of Galois theory you should know that this edit may not be looked on favorably by certain sysops here. Galois is quite the hero at Conservapedia as he was home schooled. Non constructive proofs are not in favor here. Drawing attention to the fact that the proof is non-constructive could cause you trouble. [[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 07:25, 18 January 2009 (EST) |