Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
322 bytes added ,  14:25, January 19, 2009
++
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''''John Tyndall'''''(1820–1893) was [[Michael Faraday]]'s successor at the Royal Institute.  In comparison to Faraday, his contributions were by and large irrelevant to either actual science in general or physics in particular.  Where Faraday was devout [[Christian]] and an elder within his church, Tyndall was an anti-Catholic, even somewhat fanatical, who campaigned tirelessly for liberation of science from ecclesiastical, or Church, influences. Many professors who hold to non-religious views are in fact his mondern day counterparts.
+
'''''John Tyndall'''''(1820–1893) was [[Michael Faraday]]'s successor at the Royal Institute.  In comparison to Faraday, his contributions were by and large irrelevant to either actual science in general or physics in particular.  Where Faraday was devout [[Christian]] and an elder within his church, Tyndall was an anti-Catholic, even somewhat fanatical, who campaigned tirelessly for liberation of science from ecclesiastical, or Church, influences. Many professors who hold to non-religious views are in fact his mondern day counterparts. In reality utterly ineffective in advancing science, because they lack any sort of relationship with [[God]].  As [[Paul Vitz]] puts it, [[Paul Vitz#Vitz and Creativity|"all creativity has its origin in God; and to claim that an individual human is really creative is either silly or blasphemous."]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Liberals]]
1,887

edits

Navigation menu