Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Is the theory of macroevolution true? (view source)
Revision as of 15:52, December 17, 2006
, 15:52, December 17, 2006no edit summary
==no...==
==no...==
1. No credible transitional forms (fossils reflecting evolution between species) have ever been found.
2. There is no plausible explanation for the evolution of the whale, which is a mammal. Darwin suggested that the whale somehow came from black bears swimming with their mouths open!
3. Evolution cannot be reconciled with the evidence of a massive flood.
4. All mutations are harmful.
5. Species have being going extinct rather than being generated.
6. All unaided things become more disordered and scattered over time.
7. There is vast beauty in the world, such as brilliant autumn foliage, which would not exist in a purely evolutionary world.