nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + +
no edit summary
*Overturning the will of the people, under pretext, without being convicted of any crime, before a court of law, is nothing conservatives celebrate, RJJensen. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:56, 29 January 2009 (EST)
*Overturning the will of the people, under pretext, without being convicted of any crime, before a court of law, is nothing conservatives celebrate, RJJensen. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:56, 29 January 2009 (EST)
::who expresses the will of the people of Illinois in 2009? Why the legislature of course. That is a very strong American tradition since the Founding Fathers. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 01:38, 30 January 2009 (EST)
::who expresses the will of the people of Illinois in 2009? Why the legislature of course. That is a very strong American tradition since the Founding Fathers. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 01:38, 30 January 2009 (EST)
:::Revisionist hooey, RJ. The Founders didn't have all that much confidence in "the people". That is why they insisted upon a strong Executive, and why the Judiciary was somewhat belatedly elevated to the august third branch it is today. Weighing each tradition, I would rather have the people vote upon removal than a bunch of self-interested, politically motivated legislators. Especially when there has been absolutely no real proof of his wrong doing. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:09, 30 January 2009 (EST)