40
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 134:
Line 134: + +
Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)
Revision as of 18:47, January 30, 2009
, 18:47, January 30, 2009→Why no family section?
There's a simple answer: Obama, Clinton, and Carter are Democrats. They belong to an anti-family party, therefore their family is irrelevant to their political existence. Family is central to Republican policy, and so it is impossible to understand President Bush without mentioning his family.
There's a simple answer: Obama, Clinton, and Carter are Democrats. They belong to an anti-family party, therefore their family is irrelevant to their political existence. Family is central to Republican policy, and so it is impossible to understand President Bush without mentioning his family.
[[User:LatinScholar]] 1:36, 30 January 2009 (EST)
[[User:LatinScholar]] 1:36, 30 January 2009 (EST)
:He has a family though, doesn't he? [[User:JohnKite|JohnKite]] 13:47, 30 January 2009 (EST)
== Some Changes ==
== Some Changes ==