359
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + +
→to: Myles
I read your Userpage. It made some good points, but I think you made a glaring error. The Wikipedia sourcing rules if I am not mistaken favor the "academic consensus" and likely the reports of major news outlets which I believe can be shown to have a liberal bent. Therefore, if Conservapedia grows and grows into the future which you seem to imply, it may not grow like you envision due to the sourcing rules. Also, the main page is likely to remain conservative in character (breaking news, etc.) and this will likely have an effect on the rest of the wiki. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 00:39, 17 November 2008 (EST)
I read your Userpage. It made some good points, but I think you made a glaring error. The Wikipedia sourcing rules if I am not mistaken favor the "academic consensus" and likely the reports of major news outlets which I believe can be shown to have a liberal bent. Therefore, if Conservapedia grows and grows into the future which you seem to imply, it may not grow like you envision due to the sourcing rules. Also, the main page is likely to remain conservative in character (breaking news, etc.) and this will likely have an effect on the rest of the wiki. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 00:39, 17 November 2008 (EST)
I also believe that Conservapedia will never become like Wikipedia, but for different reasons. Sysops here rarely allow viewpoints or evidence that is counter to their opinion on a given subject. Hence, the articles will not change as long as those sysops concerned with those subjects are present. --'' '''[[user:JArneal|<font color="#006666" >JArneal</font>]]'' ''' 15:01, 30 January 2009 (EST)
== Obama talkpage ==
== Obama talkpage ==
Please, try to keep discussion about ways to improve the article. Thanks. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:04, 17 November 2008 (EST)
Please, try to keep discussion about ways to improve the article. Thanks. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:04, 17 November 2008 (EST)