Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  +
 +
 
Is that "LIBERAL BIAS" economic or social?
 
Is that "LIBERAL BIAS" economic or social?
   Line 45: Line 47:     
If this site is against the liberal ideology, would it then be fair to say that it is against the liberal view of the bible? Liberal view referring to the viewpoints that came out of people like Carl Barth. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 10:52, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 
If this site is against the liberal ideology, would it then be fair to say that it is against the liberal view of the bible? Liberal view referring to the viewpoints that came out of people like Carl Barth. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 10:52, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Worry Not ==
 +
 +
Like you, for me this site was a source of disbelief, outrage, amusement  and finally, hilarity.  Sadly, it's already getting SENSIBLE.  Because other people are editting it.  And it's now getting the same liberal/leftie/international/The Rest of the World  'bias' that the billions of people who haven't been home schooled in the wilds of N. America have. For the record I'm from Scotland,  which evangelist Pat Robertson described as 'as dark country full of homosexuals'
 +
 +
The Rev Robertson certainly hasn't been to Scotland....is he confused by the kilts?
16

edits

Navigation menu