Changes

<big>'''''"So I shamelessly say, no, I want him to fail, <u>if his agenda is a far- left collectivism</u>, some people say socialism, as a conservative heartfelt, deeply, why would I want socialism to succeed?"'''''

<big>'''''"So I shamelessly say, no, I want him to fail, <u>if his agenda is a far- left collectivism</u>, some people say socialism, as a conservative heartfelt, deeply, why would I want socialism to succeed?"'''''

</big>

</big>

 

*So, Karajou, you are absolutely correct.  Liberal trolls make a out-of-context headline statement, and the knee-jerker's respond with their usual hate and [[deceit]].  What is acceptable for liberals is not allowed for conservatives, ''in their book''. As Rush said:

*So, Karajou, you are absolutely correct.  Liberal trolls make a out-of-context headline statement, and the knee-jerker's respond with their usual hate and [[deceit]].  What is acceptable for liberals is not allowed for conservatives, ''in their book''. As Rush said:

{{cquote|'''Were the liberals out there hoping Bush succeeded or were they out there trying to destroy him before he was even inaugurated?  ''Why do we have to play the game by their rules?''  Why do we have to accept the premise here that because of the historical nature of his presidency, that we want him to succeed?  This is affirmative action, if we do that.  We want to promote failure, we want to promote incompetence, we want to stand by and not object to what he's doing simply because of the color of his skin?  Sorry.  I got past the historical nature of this months ago.  He is the president of the United States, he's my president, he's a human being, and his ideas and policies are what count for me, not his skin color, not his past, not whatever ties he doesn't have to being down with the struggle, all of that's irrelevant to me.  We're talking about my country, the United States of America, my nieces, my nephews, your kids, your grandkids.  Why in the world do we want to saddle them with more liberalism and socialism?  Why would I want to do that?  So I can answer it, four words, "I hope he fails."'''}}

{{cquote|'''Were the liberals out there hoping Bush succeeded or were they out there trying to destroy him before he was even inaugurated?  ''Why do we have to play the game by their rules?''  Why do we have to accept the premise here that because of the historical nature of his presidency, that we want him to succeed?  This is affirmative action, if we do that.  We want to promote failure, we want to promote incompetence, we want to stand by and not object to what he's doing simply because of the color of his skin?  Sorry.  I got past the historical nature of this months ago.  He is the president of the United States, he's my president, he's a human being, and his ideas and policies are what count for me, not his skin color, not his past, not whatever ties he doesn't have to being down with the struggle, all of that's irrelevant to me.  We're talking about my country, the United States of America, my nieces, my nephews, your kids, your grandkids.  Why in the world do we want to saddle them with more liberalism and socialism?  Why would I want to do that?  So I can answer it, four words, "I hope he fails."'''}}

Context is everything. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]} 20:41, 4 February 2009 (EST)

'''Context is everything.''' --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]} 20:41, 4 February 2009 (EST)