Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 377: Line 377:  
My main point, however, was not that any particular kind of source was inherently better than others. Rather, it was to note that the opinions of columnists presented in the Reagan entry violate the Conservapedia policy cited above. I'd remove the quotes, but I'd get shouted down for "liberal bias" when all I want to see happen is Conservapedia actually abiding by its stated policies. <small>The preceding unsigned comment was made by</small> [[SmithHall]]
 
My main point, however, was not that any particular kind of source was inherently better than others. Rather, it was to note that the opinions of columnists presented in the Reagan entry violate the Conservapedia policy cited above. I'd remove the quotes, but I'd get shouted down for "liberal bias" when all I want to see happen is Conservapedia actually abiding by its stated policies. <small>The preceding unsigned comment was made by</small> [[SmithHall]]
   −
*There is only one quote from a columnist, which is, in the US, a different category than Journalist.  Peggy Noonan was an Assistant to the President, a member of his administration.
+
*There is only one quote from a columnist, which is, in the US, a different category than Journalist.  Peggy Noonan was an Assistant to the President, a member of his administration. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 23:36, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu