Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
add a link to remove from dead end pages
Line 5: Line 5:       −
1) I hope to come out with a better understanding of history from an unbiased perspecitve.
+
1) I hope to come out with a better understanding of history from an un[[bias]]ed perspecitve.
   −
2)  Personally I think the beginning of time lends itself most to dispute…  I am not saying that I disagree with the dates, however, if the beginning is false, every “logical” conclusion made after that must also be false.
+
2)  Personally I think the beginning of [[time]] lends itself most to dispute…  I am not saying that I disagree with the dates, however, if the beginning is false, every “logical” conclusion made after that must also be false.
    
3) Yes, it was a success, in those times… that said, this code would not be successful today, as an “eye for an eye” would not fly under modern day law, on top of that the means of tracking down someone to convict them are far superior now than back then.  We do not need an eye for an eye, unless the crime is severe enough.
 
3) Yes, it was a success, in those times… that said, this code would not be successful today, as an “eye for an eye” would not fly under modern day law, on top of that the means of tracking down someone to convict them are far superior now than back then.  We do not need an eye for an eye, unless the crime is severe enough.
6,631

edits

Navigation menu