nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + Line 4:
Line 6: + + + + + +
File talk:ScriptAmesLogo.jpg (view source)
Revision as of 05:27, March 24, 2007
, 05:27, March 24, 2007no edit summary
:: '''''debate on how to modify this logo [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#New_Script-Constitution_Logo| here], to keep it all in one place'''''
Again, I release all etc etc. -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 00:54, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
Again, I release all etc etc. -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 00:54, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
:Isn't the position of the text too low? Wouldn't it be better in the middle?
:Isn't the position of the text too low? Wouldn't it be better in the middle?
Shoot! Sorry BenjaminS, I heard "bold & fancy" from everyone else. I've put them both up, so you guys can decide together. I personally like this one a little better... don't know why. It might be less formal, is my one worry.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 01:08, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
I like this one more. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 01:10, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
*I have no idea what this one is, but the more modern typeface, juxtaposed with the script of the Constitution, is the one I like. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 01:27, 24 March 2007 (EDT)