Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Humor: Answer to Andy's question
Line 87: Line 87:     
::: ShawnJ and Sam99foster, please answer my question:  are you saying that you believe the proposition to be automatically impossible???  It sure sounds that way from some of the closed-minded postings above.  Note, by the way, that satire is not "humor" per its primary dictionary definition.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:42, 9 February 2009 (EST)
 
::: ShawnJ and Sam99foster, please answer my question:  are you saying that you believe the proposition to be automatically impossible???  It sure sounds that way from some of the closed-minded postings above.  Note, by the way, that satire is not "humor" per its primary dictionary definition.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:42, 9 February 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:::: No Andy, I don't find it automatically impossible, I find it impossible after brief consideration. That means I gave your question thought, and found it's position to be ludicrous. The question infers that somehow, before Christ, humans did not have access to the full range of their emotions. You can argue over how humor, like ethics and morality, have changed over the years, but it doesn't stop them from existing. Rejecting the notion that humor didn't exist before Christ is not an example of closed-mindedness any more than rejecting the notion that 2+2=76 is. --[[User:ShawnJ|ShawnJ]] 23:22, 9 February 2009 (EST)
    
Sir, since you say parody is not humor, is [[Essay:Born_Outside_the_U.S.A.!|this]], therefore, not funny?  
 
Sir, since you say parody is not humor, is [[Essay:Born_Outside_the_U.S.A.!|this]], therefore, not funny?  
122

edits

Navigation menu