2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 457:
Line 457: − +
Conservapedia talk:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 17:50, February 11, 2009
, 17:50, February 11, 2009→A couple criticisms
14./15. These claims are unreferenced and appear to be original research.
14./15. These claims are unreferenced and appear to be original research.
16. How does Wikipedia "encourage" "anti-intellectual" usernames? I'm glad Conservapedia is concerned with sending the proper message. This claim is unreferenced and appears to be original research.
16. How does Wikipedia "encourage" "anti-intellectual" usernames? I'm glad Conservapedia is concerned with sending the proper message. This claim is unreferenced and appears to be original research.--[[User:JohnKoziar|JohnKoziar]] 12:50, 11 February 2009 (EST)