Changes

::The Bylaws of the Medical Staff, in Article XV, Section 15.50, Paragraph 15.510, address legal representation at a medical staff hearing and state, in part, that, ". . [sic]

::The Bylaws of the Medical Staff, in Article XV, Section 15.50, Paragraph 15.510, address legal representation at a medical staff hearing and state, in part, that, ". . [sic]

::The affected practitioner, the Executive Committee, or the Board shall not be represented at the hearing by an attorney-at-law unless the hearing committee at its discretion permits both sides to be represented by counsel." The Ad Hoc Hearing Committee appointed to hear your medical staff appeal on February 17, 1990, has considered this matter and feels that the hearing proceedings will be more expedient and focused without the presence of attorneys.

::The affected practitioner, the Executive Committee, or the Board shall not be represented at the hearing by an [[attorney-at-law]] unless the hearing committee at its discretion permits both sides to be represented by counsel." The Ad Hoc Hearing Committee appointed to hear your medical staff appeal on February 17, 1990, has considered this matter and feels that the hearing proceedings will be more expedient and focused without the presence of attorneys.

:Ex. 2 to doc. 59. Therefore, even if the Act applied to civil rights actions (which it does not), it would not apply to this action. Accordingly, we conclude that the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 does not require a federal privilege for hospital peer review proceedings in a Title VII action.

:Ex. 2 to doc. 59. Therefore, even if the Act applied to civil rights actions (which it does not), it would not apply to this action. Accordingly, we conclude that the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 does not require a federal privilege for hospital peer review proceedings in a Title VII action.