10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: − +
no edit summary
I agree. This anti-Biblical bias should be corrected. At the very least, the materialist perspective should be complemented with the Christian view. Really, this is supposed to be Conservapedia, not Oldearthpedia. [[User:Brtkrbzhnv|Brtkrbzhnv]] 12:50, 26 August 2007 (EDT)
I agree. This anti-Biblical bias should be corrected. At the very least, the materialist perspective should be complemented with the Christian view. Really, this is supposed to be Conservapedia, not Oldearthpedia. [[User:Brtkrbzhnv|Brtkrbzhnv]] 12:50, 26 August 2007 (EDT)
::To the best of my knowledge CP doesn't have to ONLY operate under a Young Earth Creationist paradigm in the way that wikipedia exclusively acknowledges Darwinism as the "truth", but rather we try to be balanced and fairly represent the range of theories out there. I see no problem with stating, perhaps parenthetically, that the whole "13,000 BC" date is a theory put forth by those not ascribing to the Usher calculations. [[User:ShlomSaydetLibnan|ShlomSaydetLibnan]] 00:05, 12 February 2009 (EST)
This article should be about modern Egypt as much as possible, placing ancient Egypt in a separate page. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:28, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
This article should be about modern Egypt as much as possible, placing ancient Egypt in a separate page. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:28, 5 October 2007 (EDT)